Integral Musings | Towards a Holistic Vision

An Integral Approach to management and human development based on the spiritual vision of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother with an emphasis on its application to various domains of knowledge and life.

A Mystic Symbolism and the Future of Symbols – M.S. Srinivasan

“To commit adultery with God is the perfect experience for which the world is created.”

-Sri Aurobindo

Here, Sri Aurobindo, with a sparkling humour, provides a luminous clue to understanding the meaning of a potent symbolism of the Vaishnava mysticism.

In most of the mystical traditions the human soul is the bride and God is the bridegroom. Hence, the union of the human soul with the Divine is a respectable bourgeois marriage. But in Vaishnava mysticism the symbolism is something radically bold and different. Here, the husband of the human soul is not God but the World or the ordinary earthly life. The human soul is the adulterous and unchaste wife. God is not the legitimate bridegroom, but the clandestine divine lover and paramour with whom the human soul (like the adulterous wife) unites secretly in the nuptial chamber of the heart, unknown to the World, who is her husband.

In the final act, the human soul deserts her earthly husband and elopes with her divine paramour to Brindavan, the celestial abode of the divine lover.

This Vaishnava symbolism may appear revolting to the puritanical mind, but it is much more bold, revealing and expressive of the mystic path, the via mystica. However, this ideal of traditional mysticism, deserting the world and running away with God to heaven, may not be the highest or the most integral spiritual ideal.

Most of the ancient mysticism was world-denying and indulged too much in secrecy, keeping the beloved divine behind a brilliant mist of riddling symbols and esoteric mysteries which as Sri Aurobindo describes “…hid the sense they claimed to show”(1) and “By mysteries they explained a Mystery. A riddling answer met the riddle of things.” (2) Spirituality of the future will perhaps bring forward the divine lover into the open from the esoteric caves of mysticism and dungeons of religion and make the whole world his nuptial chamber and all humanity his bridge. When this happens then there will be no need for symbols. (3)

Symbols belong to the intermediate planes of existence and serve a purpose up to a certain stage in our spiritual evolution. But at a higher stage when we are able to see, feel, touch, live and become one with the truth of the spirit, then there is no need for symbols to understand the truth. We are still very far away from such a realisation. But, as the spiritual evolution of humanity progresses rapidly in the future, we may expect that this higher knowledge of the spirit will express itself in a less symbolic and more and more direct language like, for example, the language of the Upanishads or the spiritual poetry of Sri Aurobindo.

In Sri Aurobindo’s poetic literature we can see such a direct description of the various planes of cosmic existence without using symbols. For instance, Sri Aurobindo’s epic Savitri is like a cosmic and spiritual travelogue in which, the Traveller describes what he sees, feels and experiences, at various levels of cosmic existence, from the worlds of subtle matter to the highest spiritual worlds, in which, the eternal Truth lives unveiled in Her own self-existing and self-luminous light.As the Mother said in one of her conversations, “Savitri is an exact description – not literature, not poetry (although the form is very poetical) – an exact description, step by step, paragraph by paragraph, page by page, as I read, I relived it all…. The realism of it is astounding”. (4)

As a sample, here is a description of a higher spiritual world.

“All there was soul or made of sheet soul-stuff
A sky of soul covered a deep soul-ground
All here was known by spiritual sense
Thought was not there but a knowledge near and one
Seized on all things by a moved identity
A sympathy of self with other selves
The touch of consciousness on consciousness
And being’s look on being with inmost gaze….”(5)

Most of the religious art and literature depicts gods in their symbolic form. But in the following passage from Savitri, Sri Aurobindo gives a more direct, exact and non-symbolic description of Gods as impersonal cosmic forces of the transcendent.

“In the unchanging Silence white and nude,
Aloof, resplendent like gold dazzling suns
Veiled by the ray no mortal eye can bear
The Spirit’s bare and absolute potencies
Burn in the solitude of the thoughts of God.
A rapture, radiance and a hush
…. ….. ….
In his inalienable bliss they live
Immaculate in self-knowledge and self-power
Calm they repose on the eternal will.” (6)

The main purpose of such a spiritual poetry of the future is not merely aesthetic amusement of the literati; its aim is to reproduce as perfectly and faithfully as possible within the limitations of human speech, the sound, rhythm and vibration of the inner experience and transmit it to the reader. For in the ancient Indian thought all creation is the rhythmic expression of an eternal vibration in the Absolute. Every human and cosmic experience is in its essence, part of this eternal vibration. The aim of spiritual poetry is to catch the rhythmic vibration behind the inner experience and transmit it to the reader. This is a more direct form of spiritual communication than symbolism.

But poetry and literature are only one form of expression. There are other forms of expression like painting, sculpture or architecture in which use of symbols cannot perhaps be avoided. However, a spiritual art of the future, using the modern audio-visual media, may possibly create a new form of art in which, the spiritual experiences can be presented with as much direct realism as we find in Sri Aurobindo’s poetry, along with the sensuous concreteness provided by the audio-visual media.

Notes and References

  1. Sri Aurobindo, Savitri, 175
  2. ibid, P.187
  3. The word symbol here is used in its simpler sense as the imaged representation of an idea or experience and not in the broad philosophical sense in which it is sometimes used, for example in statements like “language is a symbol” or “the whole world is a symbol of the Transcendent”.  In this philosophical sense, except for the Divine who is the only Real, everything else is a symbol.
  4. The Mother, Invocation, Savitri Bhavan Newsletter, August 2003, P.46
  5. Sri Aurobindo, Savitri, P.292
  6. ibid, P.57

One comment on “A Mystic Symbolism and the Future of Symbols – M.S. Srinivasan

  1. Brenda
    June 17, 2015

    This semester I have been wonkrig with doctoral students as they supervise prospective teachers through their internship. I will share your wisdom with them about teaching in the present moment. With all the tensions and requirements these individuals are facing, remembering to teach in the moment is a wise reminder of what it means to be an accomplished teacher.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Information

This entry was posted on March 20, 2015 by in Religion, Spirituality & Philosophy.